Evaluation of twelve angry men

Neonatal Physiologic Characteristics 1. Total body water TBW varies inversely with fat content, and prematures have less fat deposits. The Newborn's metabolic rate is high and extra energy is needed for maintenance of body temperature and growth.

Evaluation of twelve angry men

Book I Part 1 Rhetoric is the counterpart of Dialectic. Both alike are concerned with such things as come, more or less, within the general ken of all men and belong to no definite science. Accordingly all men make use, more or less, of both; for to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves and to attack others.

Ordinary people do this either at random or through practice and from acquired habit.

Evaluation of twelve angry men

Both ways being possible, the subject can plainly be handled systematically, for it is possible to inquire the reason why some speakers succeed through practice and others spontaneously; and every one will at once agree that such an inquiry is the function of an art.

Now, the framers of the current treatises on rhetoric have constructed but a small portion of that art. The modes of persuasion are the only true constituents of the art: These writers, however, say nothing about enthymemes, which are the substance of rhetorical persuasion, but deal mainly with non-essentials.

The arousing of prejudice, pity, anger, and similar emotions has nothing to do with the essential facts, but is merely a personal appeal to the man who is judging the case. Consequently if the rules for trials which are now laid down some states-especially in well-governed states-were applied everywhere, such people would have nothing to say.

All men, no doubt, think that the laws should prescribe such rules, but some, as in the court of Areopagus, give practical effect to their thoughts and forbid talk about non-essentials. This is sound law and Evaluation of twelve angry men.

It is not right to pervert the judge by moving him to anger or envy or pity-one might as well warp a carpenter's rule before using it.

Again, a litigant has clearly nothing to do but to show that the alleged fact is so or is not so, that it has or has not happened.

Janus - Wikipedia

As to whether a thing is important or unimportant, just or unjust, the judge must surely refuse to take his instructions from the litigants: Now, it is of great moment that well-drawn laws should themselves define all the points they possibly can and leave as few as may be to the decision of the judges; and this for several reasons.

First, to find one man, or a few men, who are sensible persons and capable of legislating and administering justice is easier than to find a large number. Next, laws are made after long consideration, whereas decisions in the courts are given at short notice, which makes it hard for those who try the case to satisfy the claims of justice and expediency.

The weightiest reason of all is that the decision of the lawgiver is not particular but prospective and general, whereas members of the assembly and the jury find it their duty to decide on definite cases brought before them.

They will often have allowed themselves to be so much influenced by feelings of friendship or hatred or self-interest that they lose any clear vision of the truth and have their judgement obscured by considerations of personal pleasure or pain. In general, then, the judge should, we say, be allowed to decide as few things as possible.

But questions as to whether something has happened or has not happened, will be or will not be, is or is not, must of necessity be left to the judge, since the lawgiver cannot foresee them. If this is so, it is evident that any one who lays down rules about other matters, such as what must be the contents of the 'introduction' or the 'narration' or any of the other divisions of a speech, is theorizing about non-essentials as if they belonged to the art.

The only question with which these writers here deal is how to put the judge into a given frame of mind. About the orator's proper modes of persuasion they have nothing to tell us; nothing, that is, about how to gain skill in enthymemes. Hence it comes that, although the same systematic principles apply to political as to forensic oratory, and although the former is a nobler business, and fitter for a citizen, than that which concerns the relations of private individuals, these authors say nothing about political oratory, but try, one and all, to write treatises on the way to plead in court.

The reason for this is that in political oratory there is less inducement to talk about nonessentials. Political oratory is less given to unscrupulous practices than forensic, because it treats of wider issues. In a political debate the man who is forming a judgement is making a decision about his own vital interests.

There is no need, therefore, to prove anything except that the facts are what the supporter of a measure maintains they are. In forensic oratory this is not enough; to conciliate the listener is what pays here.

It is other people's affairs that are to be decided, so that the judges, intent on their own satisfaction and listening with partiality, surrender themselves to the disputants instead of judging between them.

Module 1 aide soignante evaluation essay

Hence in many places, as we have said already, irrelevant speaking is forbidden in the law-courts: It is clear, then, that rhetorical study, in its strict sense, is concerned with the modes of persuasion.

Persuasion is clearly a sort of demonstration, since we are most fully persuaded when we consider a thing to have been demonstrated.Wu Zetian ( – December 16, ), alternatively named Wu Zhao, Wu Hou, during the later Tang dynasty as Tian Hou, in English as Empress Consort Wu or by the deprecated term "Empress Wu", was a Chinese sovereign who ruled unofficially as empress consort and empress dowager and officially as empress regnant (皇帝) during the brief Zhou dynasty (周, –), which interrupted the Tang.

BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. The Menstuff® library lists pertinent books on Parenting - General. See Parenting - Single separately. See able Books fathers & daughters, fathers-genereal, fathers-single, fathers & sons, mentoring, mothers & daughters, mothers-general, mothers & sons, parenting-general, sex roles, sexuality-general and Issues fathers & daughters, fathers-general, fathers stories, tv violence.

A Handbook to seek information on Pediatric Surgery related topics. Created in March to help medical students and surgery residents learn basic principles of Pediatric yunusemremert.comsion is granted to copy the manual giving credit to those authors that appears.

At the end of the previous post I stated, “Remember that the Book of Acts describes a period when the Kingdom program with its accordant miracles and conferring of the Holy Spirit by the laying on of hands is on the wane but not yet gone, while the Age of Grace we have been discussing is still on the rise.

Twelve Angry Men. A Classic American Drama. Behind closed doors, tensions run high as a lone juror argues the innocence of a teenager accused of murder.

Evaluation of twelve angry men

In this provocatively resonant American drama, 12 jurors from all strata of society revisit the evidence, debate the issue of reasonable doubt and confront each other's personal .

12 Angry Men () YIFY subtitles